The thing about writing is that you have to do stuff in order to have stuff to write about. At least that's the concept. And the truth is, I don't do much now. I get the impression that I spend most of my time in a fluorescent cubicle hell, or driving a mundane car down a monotonous highway, or watching stale TV on my couch. I grimly diagnose my life as early-onset humdrum.
That said, I actually do move around a lot, considering I'm a human slug choking on apathy. I work for 8 hours each day and do a lot of reading and talking while there. My commute is complicated and can contain some curious interactions with other drivers. I play with my son for a bit in the evenings, and read books aloud to him for almost an hour each night. And while Gina & I do watch TV habitually, in my spare time I also design board games, write poetry, read the whole internet, and chop firewood. So I do stuff--I move around and stuff--and that's just on normal days. I also host a lot of dinners and go to some kinda high-brow parties and play music on the weekends and generally keep quite busy.
But the thing is, I discredit a lot of my life as boring--because it's repetitive. I-95 is, let's face it, always different but never notable. Work is just work; any American will tell you that. My son doesn't do much that's noteworthy, owing to being 3 months old. I could talk about my hobbies, but that's just sad. The parties and hosting and all of that--really just a fairly normal social life. Nothing unusual.
What's amazing to me here is that my life has always been boring in this perspective. Always. I never was the most fascinating person, I never lived the most interesting life. I went to school, and had some friends, and we talked about theology and video games and ate 5-in-the-morning Waffle House breakfasts after staying up all night laughing about things I can't remember. And after school, I played in bands, I guess--but that was always more fuss than glamor. Find a place to practice, play the same songs four hundred times, set up shows and bring the equipment--then two hours of stage time, but honestly if you have to pee halfway through it's not that great. I guess I went to internships and conferences in DC and New York--but mostly, really, they were indoor PowerPoint presentations. I didn't do anything interesting in the evenings.
But somehow, I had stuff to write about. I wrung meaning from sidewalk strangers. I turned over thoughts from overheard conversations and table talk. I shouldn't have been interesting--but, inevitably, when I look back at what I wrote, I'm interested.
So then: does writing assign value to otherwise awfully mundane streaks of time? Or were my conversations, my experiences, more interesting in years past? Is a life, observed, simply more interesting than the same life, just lived?
No comments:
Post a Comment